Greenberg v. Collins
This text of 81 So. 2d 530 (Greenberg v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Aside from any ruling in' respect to the many errors appearing in compilation .of the briefs of appellant in direct violation of Rules 34(1), 36(1), 36(5)“ (a) and (c), and 36(6) (b), (c) and (d), Supreme Court Rules, 30 F.S.A., it appears' that the cause comes squarely within the rule of Miller v. Shull, Fla., 1950, 48 So.2d 521, which has been followed by this Court without deviation. Breau v. Whitmore, Fla., 1952, 59 So.2d 748; Andrews v. Narber, Fla., 1952, 59 So.2d 869. Accordingly, it is plain that the questions raised on which the decision of the cause depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument. Rule 38(1), Supreme Court. Rules.
The motion to affirm the judgment is granted. And the judgment appealed from-; is hereby affirmed; -- "■ '
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 So. 2d 530, 1955 Fla. LEXIS 3621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenberg-v-collins-fla-1955.