Greenberg v. Clemente

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greenberg v. Clemente

83 A.D.2d 823, 443 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15187

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 27, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 83 A.D.2d 823 (Greenberg v. Clemente) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greenberg v. Clemente, 83 A.D.2d 823, 443 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Grossman, J.), entered December 17, 1980, which granted defendants’ motion to vacate a default judgment on condition that an undertaking in the sum of $250,000 be posted, unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, to eliminate the requirement for the posting of an undertaking and substitute as a condition to vacating defendants’ default costs of $250, the payment of which is to be made within 20 days after entry of [824]*824this order, and, as thus modified, the order appealed from is otherwise affirmed. In the event of defendants’ failure to comply herewith, the order appealed from is unanimously affirmed, with costs. While sufficient was shown to justify vacating the default judgment, a disposition with which we are in accord, no showing is made which would warrant the posting of security for the full amount awarded to plaintiffs. We do believe, however, that the imposition of costs in the sum indicated is appropriate in the cirsumstances presented. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Grossman, J.), entered December 17, 1980, which granted defendants’ motion to vacate a default judgment on condition that an undertaking in the sum of $250,000 be posted, unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, to eliminate the requirement for the posting of an undertaking and substitute as a condition to vacating defendants’ default costs of $250, the payment of which is to be made within 20 days after entry of [824]*824this order, and, as thus modified, the order appealed from is otherwise affirmed. In the event of defendants’ failure to comply herewith, the order appealed from is unanimously affirmed, with costs. While sufficient was shown to justify vacating the default judgment, a disposition with which we are in accord, no showing is made which would warrant the posting of security for the full amount awarded to plaintiffs. We do believe, however, that the imposition of costs in the sum indicated is appropriate in the cirsumstances presented. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.2d 823, 443 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenberg-v-clemente-nyappdiv-1981.