Greenberg v. City of Kingston
22 N.Y.S. 511, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 939
This text of 22 N.Y.S. 511 (Greenberg v. City of Kingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Greenberg v. City of Kingston, 22 N.Y.S. 511, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 939 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
Opinion
I can see no reason for an opinion. The question of contributory negligence was for the jury. The city, by working the street in question, had accepted it, and had no business to have such an excavation in it so near the traveled way. Judgment should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rising v. Town of Moreau
68 Misc. 284 (New York County Courts, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
22 N.Y.S. 511, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenberg-v-city-of-kingston-nysupct-1893.