Greenberg v. Checker Taxi Co.

75 F.2d 1014, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3157
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 1935
DocketNo. 5088
StatusPublished

This text of 75 F.2d 1014 (Greenberg v. Checker Taxi Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greenberg v. Checker Taxi Co., 75 F.2d 1014, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3157 (7th Cir. 1935).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Now this day come the parties by their counsel and present and file a stipulation to dismiss this appeal, which said stipulation is in the words and figures following, to wit: “It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Charles Greenberg and Nathan Rubenstein, Appellants in this cause, by Juliap C. Ryer and Charles A. Williams, their attorneys, and Checker Taxi Company, a corporation, Appellee, by Samuel A. Ettelson, Edward C. Higgins and L. A. Stebbins, its attorneys, that, subject to the approval of the Court, an order may be entered in this cause dismissing the appeal.”

On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, pursuant to the foregoing stipulation. It is further ordered that the costs on this appeal be taxed against the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 F.2d 1014, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenberg-v-checker-taxi-co-ca7-1935.