Greenberg v. Board of Managers

294 A.D.2d 467, 742 N.Y.S.2d 560, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5180
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 20, 2002·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, for injunctive relief, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.H.O.), dated September 1, 2000, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against it, among other things, enjoining it from prohibiting the plaintiffs from erecting a Succah on the balcony of their condominium unit.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ request for a permanent injunction, since the condominium’s governing board acted outside the scope of its authority in prohibiting them from erecting a Succah on the balcony of their condominium unit (see Matter of Levandusky v One Fifth Ave. Apt. Corp., 75 NY2d 530).

[468]*468The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Florio, O’Brien and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenberg v. Board of Managers, 294 A.D.2d 467, 742 N.Y.S.2d 560, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5180 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

294 A.D.2d 467 (Greenberg v. Board of Managers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaung v. Board of Managers of Biltmore Towers Condominium Ass'n
70 A.D.3d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Jones v. Corley
32 A.D.3d 530 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
40 West 67th Street v. Pullman
790 N.E.2d 1174 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)