Greenberg v. Bernikow Family Liquor Store

147 N.Y.S. 346

This text of 147 N.Y.S. 346 (Greenberg v. Bernikow Family Liquor Store) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greenberg v. Bernikow Family Liquor Store, 147 N.Y.S. 346 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

PAGE, J.

This action is to recover for goods sold and delivered. The plaintiff sold and delivered certain plumbing materials, which were installed in buildings at Arverne, Long Island, that were not owned by the defendant. These goods were ordered by A. Bernikow, were shipped to A. Bernikow, and a statement thereafter sent to A. Bernikow. While A. Bernikow was the treasurer of the defendant, he did not purport to act for it in this transaction. The sole connection that the defendant corporation appears to have had with the matter was that at the time the contract was made A. Bernikow drew a check on the defendants bank account, signed by himself as treasurer, for a portion of the purchase price, and gave the defendant’s note for the balance due on the first shipment. The note and check were both paid, and this action is to recover for the remaining goods covered by the contract and shipped after this first transaction was completed. The defendant was engaged in the liquor business in Grand street, New York, and was not shown to have any interest in or relation to the buildings at Arverne. There was no fact proved upon which to predicate defendant’s liability.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 N.Y.S. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenberg-v-bernikow-family-liquor-store-nyappterm-1914.