Greenberg Traurig Hoffman Lipoff Rosen & Quentel, P.A. v. Sun NLF Ltd. Partnership
This text of 719 So. 2d 1029 (Greenberg Traurig Hoffman Lipoff Rosen & Quentel, P.A. v. Sun NLF Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to Appellate Rule 9.130(a)(3)(B), we treat Greenberg Traurig’s petition for certiorari as an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order vacating an earlier stay in the underlying litigation between the parties, and hereby reverse the order under review.
Because we find that Sun NLF’s legal malpractice action against Greenberg Trau-rig depends upon the resolution of Sun NLF’s unjust enrichment action against the Dadeland Cove Homeowners’ Association, which still pends, we hold that vacation of the stay of the malpractice action was premature. See Bierman v. Miller, 639 So.2d 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Diaz v. Piquette, 496 So.2d 239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Further, in our view, Greenberg Traurig was not given proper notice of Sun NLF’s motion to vacate prior to the oral motion made by Sun NLF at the August 24,1998, hearing.
For these reasons, we hereby reverse the order under review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
719 So. 2d 1029, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13927, 1998 WL 775007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenberg-traurig-hoffman-lipoff-rosen-quentel-pa-v-sun-nlf-ltd-fladistctapp-1998.