Greenbaum v. Berenson
This text of 217 A.D. 774 (Greenbaum v. Berenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting defendants’ motion to retax costs reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The allowance of the item in defendants’ costs of their disbursements of seventy dollars for premium upon a surety bond filed by them is unauthorized by the Civil Practice Act, and is contrary to the decisions made under that act and the Code of Civil Procedure. Had a surety company bond been ordered by the court the situation presented would have been different. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 A.D. 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenbaum-v-berenson-nyappdiv-1926.