Greenbarg v. Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Greenbarg v. Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners

618 So. 2d 760, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5251, 1993 WL 152173

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 11, 1993·No. No. 92-2643·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final summary judgment in favor of Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners for two reasons. First, we find that the public was provided reasonable notice of the Board meeting, and the public hearing, § 166.041, Fla.Stat. (1989); § 125.001, Fla.Stat. (1989); see Yarbrough v. Young, 462 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); second, we find no impropriety in the Board continuing its meeting until the early morning hours. See State ex rel. Walden v. Vanosdal, 131 Ind. 388, 31 N.E. 79 (1892).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final summary judgment in favor of Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners for two reasons. First, we find that the public was provided reasonable notice of the Board meeting, and the public hearing, § 166.041, Fla.Stat. (1989); § 125.001, Fla.Stat. (1989); see Yarbrough v. Young, 462 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); second, we find no impropriety in the Board continuing its meeting until the early morning hours. See State ex rel. Walden v. Vanosdal, 131 Ind. 388, 31 N.E. 79 (1892).

Affirmed.

Greenbarg v. Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners, 618 So. 2d 760, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5251, 1993 WL 152173 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

618 So. 2d 760 (Greenbarg v. Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related