Greenaway v. Kirchhoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greenaway v. Kirchhoff

300 A.D.2d 542, 752 N.Y.S.2d 566

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 2002·Published

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant Diane Kirchhoff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated October 31, 2001, which denied her motion to transfer venue of the action from Kings County to Suffolk County and granted the plaintiff’s cross motion, inter alia, to transfer venue of the action from Kings County to New York County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly transferred venue to New York County (see CPLR 503 [a]; DelValle v Baldor Elec. Co., 265 AD2d 445). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant Diane Kirchhoff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated October 31, 2001, which denied her motion to transfer venue of the action from Kings County to Suffolk County and granted the plaintiff’s cross motion, inter alia, to transfer venue of the action from Kings County to New York County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly transferred venue to New York County (see CPLR 503 [a]; DelValle v Baldor Elec. Co., 265 AD2d 445). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Greenaway v. Kirchhoff, 300 A.D.2d 542, 752 N.Y.S.2d 566 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

300 A.D.2d 542 (Greenaway v. Kirchhoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related