Greenabaum v. Millsaps

77 Mo. 474
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedApril 15, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 77 Mo. 474 (Greenabaum v. Millsaps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greenabaum v. Millsaps, 77 Mo. 474 (Mo. 1883).

Opinion

Sherwood, J.

We are prevented from any examination into the propriety of refusing the second and third instructions asked by the plaintiff, by reason of the fact that the instructions given for the defendants are not preserved in the bill' of exceptions. What those instructions, were we can only conjecture. Presumptively they embodied correct views of the law, and besides, the instructions given on behalf of the defendants, may have covered the ground embraced in the instructions refused the plaintiff.

Therefore judgment affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Omohundro v. Emerson
80 Mo. App. 313 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1899)
State v. Hendy
49 S.W. 988 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)
State v. Hodges
45 S.W. 1093 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)
Evans-Snyder-Buell Co. v. Turner
45 S.W. 654 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)
Dawson v. Pogue
22 P. 637 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1888)
Wilkerson v. Corrigan Consolidated Street Railway Co.
26 Mo. App. 144 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)
Hoyt v. Quinn
20 Mo. App. 72 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)
Elliott v. Rosenberg
17 Mo. App. 667 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)
State v. Anderson
86 Mo. 309 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1885)
Davis v. Hilton
17 Mo. App. 319 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 Mo. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenabaum-v-millsaps-mo-1883.