Greenabaum v. Millsaps
This text of 77 Mo. 474 (Greenabaum v. Millsaps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are prevented from any examination into the propriety of refusing the second and third instructions asked by the plaintiff, by reason of the fact that the instructions given for the defendants are not preserved in the bill' of exceptions. What those instructions, were we can only conjecture. Presumptively they embodied correct views of the law, and besides, the instructions given on behalf of the defendants, may have covered the ground embraced in the instructions refused the plaintiff.
Therefore judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 Mo. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenabaum-v-millsaps-mo-1883.