Green v. Zukernick

133 So. 2d 442
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 1961·No. No. 60-666·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellee, an attorney, was sued by a former client for malpractice and breach of fiduciary relationship. The action was in chancery and sought certain equitable relief, including an accounting and a money judgment.

After hearing testimony and considering certain documentary proofs, the chancellor found against the appellant and rendered a decree dismissing the complaint with prejudice.

The appellant contends here that there was substantial evidence to support the allegations of the complaint. We have carefully considered the evidence and proofs submitted before the chancellor and are of the view that the findings made and the conclusions reached are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Conversely, there is sufficient evidence to support the chancellor’s findings, and the decree should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Zukernick, 133 So. 2d 442 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

133 So. 2d 442 (Green v. Zukernick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. Universal CIT Credit Corporation
133 So. 2d 442 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)