Green v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Green v. Wright

57 S.E. 965, 1 Ga. App. 194, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 189

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 13, 1907·No. 101·Published

Opinion

Powell, J.

The verdict was not contrary to the evidence. The requests to charge, so far as pertinent and adjusted to the issues, were covered by the general charge; and there was no error in refusing to give in charge the requests which were not pertinent and adjusted to the issues.

Judgment affirmed.

Action for damages, from city court of Floyd county — Judge Hamilton. January 30, 1906.

Submitted February 11, Decided .February 13, 1907. F. W. Copeland, for plaintiff in error. Barry Wright, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

The verdict was not contrary to the evidence. The requests to charge, so far as pertinent and adjusted to the issues, were covered by the general charge; and there was no error in refusing to give in charge the requests which were not pertinent and adjusted to the issues.

Judgment affirmed.

Action for damages, from city court of Floyd county — Judge Hamilton. January 30, 1906.

Submitted February 11, Decided .February 13, 1907. F. W. Copeland, for plaintiff in error. Barry Wright, contra.

Green v. Wright, 57 S.E. 965, 1 Ga. App. 194, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 189 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

57 S.E. 965 (Green v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.