Green v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Green v. Wright

57 S.E. 965, 1 Ga. App. 194, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 189

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 13, 1907

Docket101

StatusPublished

This text of 57 S.E. 965 (Green v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Wright, 57 S.E. 965, 1 Ga. App. 194, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 189 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

The verdict was not contrary to the evidence. The requests to charge, so far as pertinent and adjusted to the issues, were covered by the general charge; and there was no error in refusing to give in charge the requests which were not pertinent and adjusted to the issues.

Judgment affirmed.

Action for damages, from city court of Floyd county — Judge Hamilton. January 30, 1906.

Submitted February 11, Decided .February 13, 1907. F. W. Copeland, for plaintiff in error. Barry Wright, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

The verdict was not contrary to the evidence. The requests to charge, so far as pertinent and adjusted to the issues, were covered by the general charge; and there was no error in refusing to give in charge the requests which were not pertinent and adjusted to the issues.

Judgment affirmed.

Action for damages, from city court of Floyd county — Judge Hamilton. January 30, 1906.

Submitted February 11, Decided .February 13, 1907. F. W. Copeland, for plaintiff in error. Barry Wright, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 S.E. 965, 1 Ga. App. 194, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-wright-gactapp-1907.