Green v. Woodall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Green v. Woodall

70 S.E. 869, 136 Ga. 68, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 417

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 14, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 70 S.E. 869 (Green v. Woodall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Woodall, 70 S.E. 869, 136 Ga. 68, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 417 (Ga. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

ATKINSON, J.

1. This being a statutory proceeding for the partition by sale of land under the Civil Code of 1895, §§ 4786 and 4793 (Civil Code of 1910, §§ 5358 and 5365), the judge did not err, under the pleadings and evidence, in holding that a fair and equitable division of the lands and tenements could not be made by metes and bounds, and that a sale was necessary, nor in ordering a sale by commissioners appointed for the purpose.

Judgment affirmed.

Fish, O. J., absent. The other Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATKINSON, J.

1. This being a statutory proceeding for the partition by sale of land under the Civil Code of 1895, §§ 4786 and 4793 (Civil Code of 1910, §§ 5358 and 5365), the judge did not err, under the pleadings and evidence, in holding that a fair and equitable division of the lands and tenements could not be made by metes and bounds, and that a sale was necessary, nor in ordering a sale by commissioners appointed for the purpose.

Judgment affirmed.

Fish, O. J., absent. The other Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 S.E. 869, 136 Ga. 68, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-woodall-ga-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack