Green v. Williams
This text of Green v. Williams (Green v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7541
CLAUDIS B. GREEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN W. WILLIAMS, Head Nurse - Camp 27,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
D. W. BARNES, Head Physician - Camp 27,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-596-2)
Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 20, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claudis B. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY & WINDELS, Dillwyn, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Claudis B. Green appeals the order of the magistrate
judge* granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment,
denying Green’s motion for summary judgment, and dismissing his
action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Green v. Williams, CA-03-
596-2 (E.D. Va., Sept. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* This case was decided by the magistrate judge upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000).
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Green v. Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-williams-ca4-2005.