Green v. White Oak Club

81 S.E. 867, 141 Ga. 646, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 92
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 27, 1914·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

An affidavit to evict a tenant failing to pay rent, and to gain possession of the premises in dispute, was made as provided by the Civil Code, §§ 5385 et seq. A counter-affidavit was made by the defendant, which was subsequently dismissed by the court. No exception was taken to the order of dismissal. Later the defendant made a second counter-affidavit and bond as provided by section 5387 of the Civil Code. On motion of plaintiff this affidavit was also dismissed, and the defendant excepted. The sole question presented by the record is whether a defendant can file a second counterraffidavit to proceedings begun under the Civil Code, §§ 5385 et seq. - Eeld,- that in such a case a second counter-affidavit is not permissible. Hass v. Gardner, 36 Ga. 477; Paige v. Dodson, 46 Ga. 223, 224; Story v. Flournoy, 55 Ga, 56; Eppinger v. Habersham, 63 Ga. 665; Mothershead v. DeGive, 82 Ga. 193 (8 S. E. 62). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. White Oak Club, 81 S.E. 867, 141 Ga. 646, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 92 (Ga. 1914).

81 S.E. 867 (Green v. White Oak Club) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Price v. Manley
138 S.E.2d 384 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Bowman v. Quick
126 S.E.2d 536 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Burt v. Crawford
179 S.E. 82 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)