Green v. Western Union Tel. Co.
This text of 118 F. 1016 (Green v. Western Union Tel. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is very doubtful whether the record in this case presents any question for our review. See Morris v. Jackson, 9 Wall. 125, 19 L. Ed. 608; Martinton v. Fairbanks, 112 U. S. 670, 5 Sup. Ct. 321, 28 L. Ed. 862; Lehnen v. Dickson, 148 U. S. 71, 13 Sup. Ct. 481, 37 L. Ed. 373; St. Louis v. Western Union Tel. Co., 148 U. S. 92, 13 Sup. Ct. 485, 37 L. Ed. 380. The plaintiff in error urges that the evidence does not support the finding that there was a contract between the parties, which precludes the right to recover on a quantum meruit. The evidence in the case is all found in the bill of exceptions, and we have examined the same. We are satisfied that the finding of the trial judge is amply supported by the evidence. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 F. 1016, 54 C.C.A. 680, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-western-union-tel-co-ca5-1902.