Green v. Wal-Mart Store No. 863, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Green v. Wal-Mart Store No. 863, Inc.

569 So. 2d 349, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 759, 1990 WL 157453

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedSeptember 21, 1990

Docket89-705

StatusPublished

This text of 569 So. 2d 349 (Green v. Wal-Mart Store No. 863, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Wal-Mart Store No. 863, Inc., 569 So. 2d 349, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 759, 1990 WL 157453 (Ala. 1990).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Because we find no evidence to create an issue of fact with respect to the plaintiffs fraud claim, we affirm the defendant’s summary judgment on that claim.

As to the negligence claim, while we agree that the trial court properly declined to consider the evidence offered by the plaintiff in opposition to the defendant’s summary judgment motion (because it was untimely), we find ample evidence in the plaintiff’s deposition, offered by the defendant, to raise genuine issues of material fact to withstand the motion. See Cuevas v. W.E. Walker, Inc., 565 So.2d 176 (Ala. 1990).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and JONES, SHORES and KENNEDY, JJ., concur. HOUSTON, J., concurs in part; concurs specially in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI