Green v. United States

1909 OK CR 86, 99 P. 892, 2 Okla. Crim. 53, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 108
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided February 15, 1909·No. No. 593, Ind. T.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

In the trial of this cause harmful error was committed, both in the charge of the court and in the improper exclusion of testimony. We will, however, at this time withhold discussion of the various assignments of error, in order that counsel may have an opportunity further to argue the ease, if they so desire.

The motion for a rehearing will be sustained.

[See opinion following. — Rep.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. United States, 1909 OK CR 86, 99 P. 892, 2 Okla. Crim. 53, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 108 (Okla. Ct. App. 1909).

1909 OK CR 86 (Green v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. State
1910 OK CR 207 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1910)