Green v. Unaatuq, LLC
669 F. App'x 398
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 26, 2016
DocketNo. 15-35197, No. 15-35205
StatusPublished
This text of 669 F. App'x 398 (Green v. Unaatuq, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Green v. Unaatuq, LLC, 669 F. App'x 398 (9th Cir. 2016).
Opinion
ORDER AMENDING
The memorandum disposition filed on August 17, 2016 is amended on page three line six by adding new footnote one, which states:
Claimants’ argument that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction over them fails. Claimants filed a Rule 60(b)(4) motion in the bankruptcy court seeking relief from the prior sale order, arguing that they had acquired title to a portion of the Property through adverse possession. See Wellness Int’l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif [— U.S. -], 135 S.Ct. 1932, 1939 [91 L.Ed.2d 911] (2015) (stating there is no jurisdictional defect “when the parties knowingly and voluntarily consent to adjudication by a bankruptcy judge”).
With this amendment, the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing shall be filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif
575 U.S. 665 (Supreme Court, 2015)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
669 F. App'x 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-unaatuq-llc-ca9-2016.