Green v. Unaatuq, LLC
669 F. App'x 398
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 26, 2016·No. No. 15-35197, No. 15-35205·Published
Opinion
ORDER AMENDING
The memorandum disposition filed on August 17, 2016 is amended on page three line six by adding new footnote one, which states:
Claimants’ argument that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction over them fails. Claimants filed a Rule 60(b)(4) motion in the bankruptcy court seeking relief from the prior sale order, arguing that they had acquired title to a portion of the Property through adverse possession. See Wellness Int’l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif [— U.S. -], 135 S.Ct. 1932, 1939 [91 L.Ed.2d 911] (2015) (stating there is no jurisdictional defect “when the parties knowingly and voluntarily consent to adjudication by a bankruptcy judge”).
With this amendment, the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing shall be filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Green v. Unaatuq, LLC, 669 F. App'x 398 (9th Cir. 2016).
669 F. App'x 398 (Green v. Unaatuq, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif
575 U.S. 665 (Supreme Court, 2015)