Green v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

762 P.2d 1067, 93 Or. App. 623
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 26, 1988·No. A8701-00408; CA A46181·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is an action to recover damages for personal injury. The circuit court referred the matter to mandatory arbitration pursuant to ORS 33.360. The arbitrator’s award in favor of defendants was rendered 55 days after the hearing. Plaintiff then moved to set aside the award as not being timely filed and because it misstated the time for appeal.1 The trial court entered a judgment adopting the arbitrator’s award after the time for appeal to the circuit court had expired and later denied plaintiffs motion. Plaintiff appeals, arguing that the award was void, because it was not filed within seven days after the end of the hearing.

Supplementary Local Court Rule 13.225(1) provides, in relevant part:

“Within seven days after the conclusion of the arbitration hearing, the arbitrator shall file the decision and award with the clerk of the Court * * * ”

The rule prescribes what shall be done but does not prescribe the consequences of noncompliance. Nothing in the rule suggests that its violation makes the arbitrator’s award void.2 See Annot., 56 ALR3d 815, 819,828-30 (1974). Plaintiff claims no prejudice from the delay.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District, 762 P.2d 1067, 93 Or. App. 623 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

762 P.2d 1067 (Green v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barzilay and Barzilay
Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2023
Santos-Macha v. Stelmen Plastering, Inc.
225 P.3d 112 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)
Monroe v. Harmon
973 P.2d 392 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)