Green v. Toledo Hosp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Green v. Toledo Hosp.

93 Ohio St. 3d 1258

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 24, 2001

Docket00-1625

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1258 (Green v. Toledo Hosp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Toledo Hosp., 93 Ohio St. 3d 1258 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-97-1457. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Lucas County. Upon consideration of the application for dismissal of appeal of R. Van Bergen, M.D., and McAlpine, Foster, Montresinos & Van Bergen, Inc., only,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

The appeal of Harold R. Stevens, M.D., Katchka, Friedman & Crider, Inc., and Toledo Hospital remains pending.

Resnick, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas App. No. L-97-1457. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Lucas County. Upon consideration of the application for dismissal of appeal of R. Van Bergen, M.D., and McAlpine, Foster, Montresinos & Van Bergen, Inc., only,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

The appeal of Harold R. Stevens, M.D., Katchka, Friedman & Crider, Inc., and Toledo Hospital remains pending.

Resnick, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. 3d 1258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-toledo-hosp-ohio-2001.