Green v. Thresher

83 A. 711, 235 Pa. 169, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 521
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 19, 1912·No. Appeal, No. 273·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The first five facts found by the court below are not open to dispute, and, in view of the sixth, which was fully justified by the evidence, the relief asked for could not have been withheld. Decree affirmed at appellants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Thresher, 83 A. 711, 235 Pa. 169, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 521 (Pa. 1912).

83 A. 711 (Green v. Thresher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pilgrim Plywood Corp. v. Melendy
1 A.2d 700 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1938)
Valmont Developing Co. v. Rosser
146 A. 557 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Borough of Summerhill v. Sherbine
88 Pa. Super. 419 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)