Green v. Taylor
This text of 71 So. 375 (Green v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The court below erred in not rendering judgment in favor of plaintiffs upon their motion for same. The de[234]*234fense interposed in the court below was but a collateral attack upon tbe judgment upon which, the execution was-issued. That this cannot be done' has been repeatedly-held by this court. See Vicksburg Grocery Co. v. Brennan, 20 So. 845, and authorities therein cited.
Reversed, and judgment here for appellant for amount sued for.
Reversed, and judgment here.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 So. 375, 111 Miss. 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-taylor-miss-1916.