Green v. Taylor

Mississippi Supreme Court

Green v. Taylor

71 So. 375, 111 Miss. 232

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1916·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Sykes, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The court below erred in not rendering judgment in favor of plaintiffs upon their motion for same. The de[234]*234fense interposed in the court below was but a collateral attack upon tbe judgment upon which, the execution was-issued. That this cannot be done' has been repeatedly-held by this court. See Vicksburg Grocery Co. v. Brennan, 20 So. 845, and authorities therein cited.

Reversed, and judgment here for appellant for amount sued for.

Reversed, and judgment here.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sykes, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The court below erred in not rendering judgment in favor of plaintiffs upon their motion for same. The de[234]*234fense interposed in the court below was but a collateral attack upon tbe judgment upon which, the execution was-issued. That this cannot be done' has been repeatedly-held by this court. See Vicksburg Grocery Co. v. Brennan, 20 So. 845, and authorities therein cited.

Reversed, and judgment here for appellant for amount sued for.

Reversed, and judgment here.

Green v. Taylor, 71 So. 375, 111 Miss. 232 (Mich. 1916).

Pincite

71 So. 375 (Green v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related