Green v. Sumby

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Green v. Sumby

93 A. 868, 248 Pa. 120, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 523

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 8, 1915

DocketAppeal, No. 244

StatusPublished

This text of 93 A. 868 (Green v. Sumby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Sumby, 93 A. 868, 248 Pa. 120, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 523 (Pa. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

If there were any merit in this appeal, the appellant would suffer for counsel’s gross violation of rule 34, relating to the statement of the question or questions involved. The violation of the rule in the present case consists in devoting thirty lines, covering a whole page, to what could have been intelligently stated in less than the prescribed limit. The appeal must be quashed: Duffee v. Bankers’ Surety Company, 247 Pa. 17.

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

If there were any merit in this appeal, the appellant would suffer for counsel’s gross violation of rule 34, relating to the statement of the question or questions involved. The violation of the rule in the present case consists in devoting thirty lines, covering a whole page, to what could have been intelligently stated in less than the prescribed limit. The appeal must be quashed: Duffee v. Bankers’ Surety Company, 247 Pa. 17.

Appeal quashed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A. 868, 248 Pa. 120, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-sumby-pa-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack