Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Green v. Studen

Green v. Studen

622 So. 2d 197, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8825, 1993 WL 321013
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 25, 1993
DocketNo. 93-0344
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 622 So. 2d 197 (Green v. Studen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Studen, 622 So. 2d 197, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8825, 1993 WL 321013 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in entering a temporary injunction without making the findings required under Rule 1.610(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and then in denying dissolution thereof without conducting any evidentiary hearing. Upon remand, any orders entered should be in compliance with Rule 1.610(c). See Russo v. Romano, 591 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Allegra Enterprises, Inc. v. Fairchild, 455 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Premier Lab Supply, Inc. v. Chemplex Industries, Inc.
10 So. 3d 202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 So. 2d 197, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8825, 1993 WL 321013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-studen-fladistctapp-1993.