Green v. Studen
622 So. 2d 197, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8825, 1993 WL 321013
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 1993·No. No. 93-0344·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in entering a temporary injunction without making the findings required under Rule 1.610(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and then in denying dissolution thereof without conducting any evidentiary hearing. Upon remand, any orders entered should be in compliance with Rule 1.610(c). See Russo v. Romano, 591 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Allegra Enterprises, Inc. v. Fairchild, 455 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Green v. Studen, 622 So. 2d 197, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8825, 1993 WL 321013 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
622 So. 2d 197 (Green v. Studen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Premier Lab Supply, Inc. v. Chemplex Industries, Inc.
10 So. 3d 202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)