Green v. Stone

1 Walk. Ch. 109
CourtMichigan Court of Chancery
DecidedJanuary 15, 1843
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Walk. Ch. 109 (Green v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Stone, 1 Walk. Ch. 109 (Mich. Ct. App. 1843).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The note was negotiable, and had been endorsed by the payees. To give this Court jurisdiction, it is not necessary that it should have been lost [110]*110before it was due. In Rowley v. Ball, 3 Cow. R. 303, and Poole v. Smith, 1 Holt R. 144, it was held a recovery could not be had at law on a lost note, although it was past due when it was lost.

Decree for complainant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Walk. Ch. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-stone-michchanct-1843.