Green v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Green v. State

208 S.W. 514, 84 Tex. Crim. 485, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 32

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 29, 1919

DocketNo. 5262.

StatusPublished

This text of 208 S.W. 514 (Green v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. State, 208 S.W. 514, 84 Tex. Crim. 485, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 32 (Tex. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

*486 DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The indictment charges appellant with making an appointment for and soliciting a soldier in the United States service to meet a woman for the purpose of illicit intercourse.

The record is before us without a statement of facts. or bills of, exception. Under such circumstances the rule is that this court will presume that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the case as charged by the indictment. A state of facts will be presumed by this court which were provable under the allegations of the indictment in the absence of a statement of facts. We have other statutes with reference to punishing solicitors of this character, of a general nature, prohibiting all parties from doing such prohibited acts. In this particular matter the Legislature provided that parties who made such solicitations between a woman and a soldier should be punished as described in the statute. No sufficient reason has been suggested why the Legislature was not clothed with this authority.

Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*486 DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The indictment charges appellant with making an appointment for and soliciting a soldier in the United States service to meet a woman for the purpose of illicit intercourse.

The record is before us without a statement of facts. or bills of, exception. Under such circumstances the rule is that this court will presume that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the case as charged by the indictment. A state of facts will be presumed by this court which were provable under the allegations of the indictment in the absence of a statement of facts. We have other statutes with reference to punishing solicitors of this character, of a general nature, prohibiting all parties from doing such prohibited acts. In this particular matter the Legislature provided that parties who made such solicitations between a woman and a soldier should be punished as described in the statute. No sufficient reason has been suggested why the Legislature was not clothed with this authority.

Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 S.W. 514, 84 Tex. Crim. 485, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-state-texcrimapp-1919.