Green v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Green v. State

1921 OK CR 12, 193 P. 1077, 18 Okla. Crim. 715, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 179

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 15, 1921·No. A-3675·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case the Attorney General has confessed error, setting out that the record fails to disclose that the plaintiff in error was in'possession of the certain intoxicating liquor for unlawful purposes, as charged in the information, and a reading of the record bears out the Attorney General’s contention.

The case is therefore reversed and remanded to the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case the Attorney General has confessed error, setting out that the record fails to disclose that the plaintiff in error was in'possession of the certain intoxicating liquor for unlawful purposes, as charged in the information, and a reading of the record bears out the Attorney General’s contention.

The case is therefore reversed and remanded to the trial court.

Green v. State, 1921 OK CR 12, 193 P. 1077, 18 Okla. Crim. 715, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 179 (Okla. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

1921 OK CR 12 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.