Green v. State
882 S.W.2d 298, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1171, 1994 WL 371902
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Green v. State, 882 S.W.2d 298, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1171, 1994 WL 371902 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
882 S.W.2d 298 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCormack v. Capital Electric Construction Co.
35 S.W.3d 410 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)
State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Westbrooke
12 S.W.3d 386 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)
Wilson v. River Market Venture, I, L.P.
996 S.W.2d 687 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1999)