Green v. State

67 Miss. 356
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The evidence is insufficient to support the verdict of the jury. We may conjecture the purpose of the defendant to have been to commit a rape, but, on the facts disclosed, it is conjecture only, and not an inference reasonably drawn from the evidence. The probabilities may be greater that a rape was intended rather than robbery or murder, but mere probability of guilt of a particular crime, and that, too, springing more from instinct than from proved facts, cannot support a verdict of guilty.

There is great danger of improper convictions in cases of this character,, and, while the court should not for that reason invade the province of the jury, the danger admonishes us of the necessity' of standing firmly upon the right and duty of proper supervision and control of them.

The judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. State, 67 Miss. 356 (Mich. 1889).

67 Miss. 356 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Laster v. State
275 S.W.3d 512 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Carter v. State
932 So. 2d 850 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2006)
Clemons v. State
470 So. 2d 653 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1985)
Watson v. Nix
551 F. Supp. 1 (S.D. Iowa, 1982)
Brooks v. State
360 So. 2d 704 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1978)
Aikerson v. State
295 So. 2d 778 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1974)
Fondren, Alias Taylor v. State
175 So. 2d 628 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Tremaine v. State
148 So. 2d 517 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
State v. Lindsey
32 So. 2d 876 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1947)
Pew v. State
161 So. 678 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1935)
Spurlock v. State
130 So. 155 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1930)
Woodson v. Commonwealth
59 S.E. 1097 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1908)
Dorsey v. State
34 S.E. 135 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)