Green v. State
This text of 98 S.E. 553 (Green v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1.' “On the trial of one charged with a violation of the act of 1910 (Acts 1910, p. 134 [Park’s Ann. Penal Code, § 348a]), the State makes out a prima facie case when it proves that the accused carried a pistol on his person, or had manual possession of a pistol, not at his home or place of business, and the burden is upon the accused to show, in answer to this evidence, that he had a license as prescribed by [520]*520the act.” Blocker v. State, 12 Ga. App. 81 (3) (76 S. E.784). See also Russell v. State, 12 Ga. App. 557 (77 S. E. 829) ; Harden v. State, 17 Ga. App. 322 (86 S. E. 736); Elkins v. State, 17 Ga. App. 479 (87 S. E. 713).
2. The motion for a new trial contained only the general grounds, there was evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the presiding judge, and the judgment must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 S.E. 553, 23 Ga. App. 519, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-state-gactapp-1919.