Green v. State
Opinion
1.' “On the trial of one charged with a violation of the act of 1910 (Acts 1910, p. 134 [Park’s Ann. Penal Code, § 348a]), the State makes out a prima facie case when it proves that the accused carried a pistol on his person, or had manual possession of a pistol, not at his home or place of business, and the burden is upon the accused to show, in answer to this evidence, that he had a license as prescribed by [520] the act.” Blocker v. State, 12 Ga. App. 81 (3) (76 S. E.784). See also Russell v. State, 12 Ga. App. 557 (77 S. E. 829) ; Harden v. State, 17 Ga. App. 322 (86 S. E. 736); Elkins v. State, 17 Ga. App. 479 (87 S. E. 713).
2. The motion for a new trial contained only the general grounds, there was evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the presiding judge, and the judgment must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
98 S.E. 553 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.