Green v. State

9 So. 3d 763, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5820, 2009 WL 1383471
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 946 So. 2d 558
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 19, 2009·No. 1D08-4861·Published

Opinion

*764 PER CURIAM.

The appellant has filed a rule 3.800(a) motion asserting that his 30-year sentence for a second-degree felony is illegal. The trial court denied the claim on the basis that the appellant raised the identical claim numerous times in the past. However, none of the attachments provided by the trial court refute the appellant’s specific claim raised in the instant motion, or even demonstrate that this claim has previously been addressed on the merits.

We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to attach record evidence that either establishes that this claim is successive or that conclusively refutes the appellant’s entitlement to relief, or to grant the appellant the relief he seeks. See Byers v. State, 916 So.2d 923 (Fla. 1st DCA2005).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DAVIS, BROWNING and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. State, 9 So. 3d 763, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5820, 2009 WL 1383471 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

9 So. 3d 763 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Byers v. State
916 So. 2d 923 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)