Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Green v. State

Green v. State

931 So. 2d 146, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6513, 2006 WL 1152760
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 857 So. 2d 304 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 3, 2006·No. No. 1D05-5861·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We AFFIRM the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burchfield v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

KAHN, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. State, 931 So. 2d 146, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6513, 2006 WL 1152760 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

931 So. 2d 146 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burchfield v. State
907 So. 2d 614 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)