Green v. State

673 So. 2d 937, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5437, 1996 WL 263407
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 20, 1996·No. No. 95-1818·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court refused to allow appellant’s counsel to use available peremptory challenges before the jury was sworn. This action constitutes per se reversible error. Gilliam v. State, 514 So.2d 1098, 1099 (Fla. 1987); Johnson v. State, 565 So.2d 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Accordingly, we are obliged to reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence and remand for a new trial.

MINER and MICKLE, JJ., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. State, 673 So. 2d 937, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5437, 1996 WL 263407 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

673 So. 2d 937 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dante v. State
903 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)