Green v. State

604 So. 2d 926, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9735, 1992 WL 220525
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 571 So. 2d 571
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 1992·No. No. 92-03203·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Dexter Green timely appeals the summary denial of his motion for postcon-viction relief. In his motion he alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective by not filing a timely notice of appeal from his original convictions, even though Green timely requested him to do so. See State v. District Court of Appeal, First District, 569 So.2d 439 (Fla.1990). The trial court denied Green’s motion as untimely filed as it was not filed within two years after Green’s judgments and sentences became final. This ruling was in error in light of this court’s decision in Hickman v. State, 581 So.2d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Accordingly, we reverse the court’s summary denial of the appellant’s postconviction relief motion and remand for further proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., SCHOONOVER and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. State, 604 So. 2d 926, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9735, 1992 WL 220525 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

604 So. 2d 926 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal, First Dist.
569 So. 2d 439 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Hickman v. State
581 So. 2d 942 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)