Green v. State

526 So. 2d 968, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1253, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2325, 1988 WL 56097
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2271
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 25, 1988·No. No. BO-302·Published

Opinion

[969]*969ORDER OF DISMISSAL

NIMMONS, Judge.

By previous order, this Court relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of conducting a hearing to determine whether the trial court’s ruling on the motion to suppress was dispositive of the case. Our opinion relinquishing jurisdiction appears in Green v. State, 508 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

As is evident from our earlier opinion, the question for resolution by the trial court upon relinquishment of jurisdiction was whether the quantity of cocaine seized from the subject automobile (exclusive of that which was seized from the nearby house) was at least 28 grams. We have examined the evidence contained in the supplemental record consisting of the transcript of the hearing before the trial court. The testimony is clear — indeed, it is uncon-troverted — that the quantity of cocaine seized from the automobile weighed in excess of 28 grams.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed inasmuch as it is clear that the order sought to be appealed was not dispositive.

SHIVERS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. State, 526 So. 2d 968, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1253, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2325, 1988 WL 56097 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

526 So. 2d 968 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. State
508 So. 2d 481 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)