Green v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Green v. State

164 So. 2d 826, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4313

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 4, 1964

DocketNo. F-111

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 164 So. 2d 826 (Green v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. State, 164 So. 2d 826, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4313 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appellant appeals an order entered by the Criminal Court of Record of Duval County, Florida, wherein Judge Layton of that court denied a hearing upon the contents of his motion. The subject motion clearly alleges a prima facie case entitling the movant to relief in accordance with the provisions of Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The record in the cause does not refute the allegations set forth by petitioner. Therefore, in accordance with the language of said rule— “ * * * Unless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon the prosecuting attorney of the court, grant a prompt hearing thereon, determine the issues and make findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect thereto. * * * ” appellant is entitled to a prompt hearing.

The trial court arbitrarily refused to so comply with the material provisions of the [827]*827rule in this cause. The order of the trial judge denying relief is hereby set aside and he is directed to forthwith grant to petitioner a hearing as provided for in said rule.

STURGIS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appellant appeals an order entered by the Criminal Court of Record of Duval County, Florida, wherein Judge Layton of that court denied a hearing upon the contents of his motion. The subject motion clearly alleges a prima facie case entitling the movant to relief in accordance with the provisions of Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The record in the cause does not refute the allegations set forth by petitioner. Therefore, in accordance with the language of said rule— “ * * * Unless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon the prosecuting attorney of the court, grant a prompt hearing thereon, determine the issues and make findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect thereto. * * * ” appellant is entitled to a prompt hearing.

The trial court arbitrarily refused to so comply with the material provisions of the [827]*827rule in this cause. The order of the trial judge denying relief is hereby set aside and he is directed to forthwith grant to petitioner a hearing as provided for in said rule.

STURGIS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 So. 2d 826, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-state-fladistctapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack