Green v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Green v. State

985 S.W.2d 319, 336 Ark. 435, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 94

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedFebruary 18, 1999

DocketCR 99-126

StatusPublished

This text of 985 S.W.2d 319 (Green v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. State, 985 S.W.2d 319, 336 Ark. 435, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 94 (Ark. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Charles Green, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Thomas A. Young, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Charles Green, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Thomas A. Young, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

985 S.W.2d 319, 336 Ark. 435, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-state-ark-1999.