Green v. Sprogle

16 Md. 579, 1861 Md. LEXIS 8
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedFebruary 20, 1861
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Md. 579 (Green v. Sprogle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Sprogle, 16 Md. 579, 1861 Md. LEXIS 8 (Md. 1861).

Opinion

Le Grand, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of this court:

This, like the case of Green vs. Caulk, (ante., 556,) is an action instituted to recover the value of certain work done and materials furnished, by the plaintiff, in the repair of the house of the defendant. At the trial below the defendant reserved four exceptions. For the reasons assigned in the opinion filed in the case referred to, we reverse the Circuit court on the first three exceptions. The court is affirmed on the fourth exception. The testimony could not have the effect of binding the plaintiff, inasmuch as the declarations of Mr. Randall were not made to him, nor in his presence.

Judgment reversed and procedendo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Md. 579, 1861 Md. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-sprogle-md-1861.