Green v. Spinard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Green v. Spinard

284 A.D. 905, 135 N.Y.S.2d 655, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4019

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 25, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D. 905 (Green v. Spinard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Spinard, 284 A.D. 905, 135 N.Y.S.2d 655, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, claimed to have been caused by appellant’s negligence in permitting his cows to enter upon and roam on a public highway, defendant Bernard Spinard appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur. Adel, Acting P. J., and Beldoek, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: On the proof in this record it is clear that the presence of the cows on the highway was not unlawful and was not a concurring cause of the accident. Under all the circumstances the conclusion is inescapable, as a matter of law, that plaintiff did not have his car under control.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, claimed to have been caused by appellant’s negligence in permitting his cows to enter upon and roam on a public highway, defendant Bernard Spinard appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur. Adel, Acting P. J., and Beldoek, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: On the proof in this record it is clear that the presence of the cows on the highway was not unlawful and was not a concurring cause of the accident. Under all the circumstances the conclusion is inescapable, as a matter of law, that plaintiff did not have his car under control.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D. 905, 135 N.Y.S.2d 655, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-spinard-nyappdiv-1954.