Green v. Rosenblum (Ballot Title)

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided November 27, 2013·No. S061610·Published

Opinion

MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITIONS

BALLOT TITLES CERTIFIED

November 27, 2013

Green v. Rosenblum (S061610). Petitioner’s argument that the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 20 (2014) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure. Towers v. Rosenblum (S061292)(354 Or 125). The objections to the Attorney General’s modified ballot title filed by intervenor Jill Gibson Odell are not well taken, and the court denies the same. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General’s modified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 9 (2014). ORS 250.085(10)(a). Witt v. Rosenblum (S061697). Petitioner’s argument that the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 27 (2014) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Rosenblum (Ballot Title), (Or. 2013).

Green v. Rosenblum (Ballot Title) (Green v. Rosenblum (Ballot Title)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Towers v. Rosenblum
310 P.3d 1136 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2013)