Green v. Reynolds

New York Supreme Court

Green v. Reynolds

2 Johns. 207

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 15, 1807

StatusPublished

Cited by21 cases

This text of 2 Johns. 207 (Green v. Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Reynolds, 2 Johns. 207 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1807).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The covenants in this case are clearly dependent. The one thousand dollars, being in part of the consideration for the deed,- and to be paid on the same day the deed was to be delivered, the fair intent and good sense of the contract is, that the money is not to be paid until the deed is ready for delivery. The de[209]*209ciarafion, therefore, is defective in not averring a tender of the deed by the plaintiff, We are of opinion that the defendant is entitled to judgment ; but the plaintiff may amend his declaration on payment Of the .eosts.

Jugdment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The covenants in this case are clearly dependent. The one thousand dollars, being in part of the consideration for the deed,- and to be paid on the same day the deed was to be delivered, the fair intent and good sense of the contract is, that the money is not to be paid until the deed is ready for delivery. The de[209]*209ciarafion, therefore, is defective in not averring a tender of the deed by the plaintiff, We are of opinion that the defendant is entitled to judgment ; but the plaintiff may amend his declaration on payment Of the .eosts.

Jugdment for the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Johns. 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-reynolds-nysupct-1807.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack