Green v. Powell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Green v. Powell

261 S.E.2d 746, 151 Ga. App. 773, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2677

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 16, 1979

Docket58542

StatusPublished

This text of 261 S.E.2d 746 (Green v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Powell, 261 S.E.2d 746, 151 Ga. App. 773, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2677 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

This is a wrongful death action. Plaintiffs decedent was a pedestrian crossing Washington Road (Georgia Highway 104) in Richmond County when he was struck by defendant’s automobile, causing the injuries which resulted in his death. Plaintiff brought this action for damages, alleging that the decedent was killed as a result of the negligence of the defendant. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. Plaintiffs appeal raises only the general grounds for motion for new trial. Held:

Generally issues of negligence are for the jury. Piland v. Meli, 143 Ga. App. 783, 784 (240 SE2d 193); James v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 140 Ga. App. 859 (232 SE2d 274). The evidence in the case sub judice, although conflicting, authorized the jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendant.

Plaintiffs evidence was that the defendant was traveling at a high rate of speed and when cautioned by a passenger in his automobile of the presence of the decedent on the highway, failed to exercise appropriate precautions to avoid striking the decedent. Defendant’s evidence was that he was traveling at approximately 45 miles per hour and that when cautioned as to the presence of the decedent on the roadway began a swerving maneuver to avoid the decedent, but that the decedent, who had his back to defendant’s vehicle, suddenly ran into the path of defendant’s automobile. It was for the jury to resolve the conflict of evidence, and in so doing, they were [774]*774authorized to determine that the proximate cause of decedent’s death did not lie in any negligence on the part of defendant.

Submitted September 26, 1979 Decided October 16, 1979. James E. Blanchard, Jr., for appellant. Gould B. Hagler, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Banke and Underwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

This is a wrongful death action. Plaintiffs decedent was a pedestrian crossing Washington Road (Georgia Highway 104) in Richmond County when he was struck by defendant’s automobile, causing the injuries which resulted in his death. Plaintiff brought this action for damages, alleging that the decedent was killed as a result of the negligence of the defendant. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. Plaintiffs appeal raises only the general grounds for motion for new trial. Held:

Generally issues of negligence are for the jury. Piland v. Meli, 143 Ga. App. 783, 784 (240 SE2d 193); James v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 140 Ga. App. 859 (232 SE2d 274). The evidence in the case sub judice, although conflicting, authorized the jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendant.

Plaintiffs evidence was that the defendant was traveling at a high rate of speed and when cautioned by a passenger in his automobile of the presence of the decedent on the highway, failed to exercise appropriate precautions to avoid striking the decedent. Defendant’s evidence was that he was traveling at approximately 45 miles per hour and that when cautioned as to the presence of the decedent on the roadway began a swerving maneuver to avoid the decedent, but that the decedent, who had his back to defendant’s vehicle, suddenly ran into the path of defendant’s automobile. It was for the jury to resolve the conflict of evidence, and in so doing, they were [774]*774authorized to determine that the proximate cause of decedent’s death did not lie in any negligence on the part of defendant.

Submitted September 26, 1979 Decided October 16, 1979. James E. Blanchard, Jr., for appellant. Gould B. Hagler, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Banke and Underwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 S.E.2d 746, 151 Ga. App. 773, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-powell-gactapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack