Green v. Pelton Concrete

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Green v. Pelton Concrete

807 P.2d 344, 106 Or. App. 421, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 473

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 20, 1991

Docket86-09604; CA A63997

StatusPublished

This text of 807 P.2d 344 (Green v. Pelton Concrete) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Pelton Concrete, 807 P.2d 344, 106 Or. App. 421, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 473 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board reversing the referee’s decision that he is permanently and totally disabled. Although we agree with employer that substantial evidence supports the Board’s findings concerning permanent and total disability, we reverse and remand to the Board, because there is a preliminary issue that must be decided.

From the outset, claimant has contended that the determination order, which awarded him 30 percent permanent partial disability for loss of use of his right leg, was inadequate. In the alternative, he contended that the order had been entered prematurely. We conclude that he preserved the alternative issue for Board review. Because the referee found that claimant was permanently and totally disabled, she held that she did not need to address whether the claim had been prematurely closed. The Board, in reversing the referee, also failed to address whether the claim had been prematurely closed. Contrary to the referee’s reasoning, whether the claim was prematurely closed is a question that must be decided before any award of benefits can be made.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board reversing the referee’s decision that he is permanently and totally disabled. Although we agree with employer that substantial evidence supports the Board’s findings concerning permanent and total disability, we reverse and remand to the Board, because there is a preliminary issue that must be decided.

From the outset, claimant has contended that the determination order, which awarded him 30 percent permanent partial disability for loss of use of his right leg, was inadequate. In the alternative, he contended that the order had been entered prematurely. We conclude that he preserved the alternative issue for Board review. Because the referee found that claimant was permanently and totally disabled, she held that she did not need to address whether the claim had been prematurely closed. The Board, in reversing the referee, also failed to address whether the claim had been prematurely closed. Contrary to the referee’s reasoning, whether the claim was prematurely closed is a question that must be decided before any award of benefits can be made.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

807 P.2d 344, 106 Or. App. 421, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-pelton-concrete-orctapp-1991.