Green v. Oregon State Penitentiary

770 P.2d 612, 95 Or. App. 738
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 22, 1989·No. 07-87-388; CA A45847·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner, an inmate at the Oregon State Penitentiary, seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent finding him guilty of violating Disciplinary Rule 13: conspiracy to possess or use narcotics. He was ordered to serve three months in segregation and to pay a $100 fine. He contends that there was not sufficient admissible evidence to support the finding of guilty and that the superintendent does not have authority to impose a fine.

We conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty. We agree with the state’s concession that there is no authority to impose a fine for violation of Corrections Division disciplinary rules. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Reversed as to fine; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 770 P.2d 612, 95 Or. App. 738 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

770 P.2d 612 (Green v. Oregon State Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watson v. Oregon State Penitentiary
750 P.2d 1188 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)