Green v. New York City Transit Authority

S.D. New York

Green v. New York City Transit Authority

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 19, 2022·No. 1:15-cv-08204-ALC-SN·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC#: DATE FILED: _ 7/19/2022 TAMMY GREEN, Plaintiff, -v.- 15-cv-8204 (ALC) (SN) NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY ORDER and ROOSEVELT LARRIER, Defendants

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge: On April 21, 2022, this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn for general pretrial matters. The Court now considers the Report and Recommendation issued by Judge Netburn, recommending that Defendant’s motion to enforce the Settlement agreement be granted. Despite notification of the right to object to the Report and Recommendation, no objections were filed. Where no timely objections are made, the district court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error. Sacks v. Gandhi Eng’g, Inc., 999 F. Supp. 2d 629, 632 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). As there are no objections to the Report and Recommendation and as the Court finds no clear error in the record, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

SO ORDERED. Dated: July 19, 2022 New York, New York / ka ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. □ United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC#: DATE FILED: _ 7/19/2022 TAMMY GREEN, Plaintiff, -v.- 15-cv-8204 (ALC) (SN) NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY ORDER and ROOSEVELT LARRIER, Defendants

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge: On April 21, 2022, this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn for general pretrial matters. The Court now considers the Report and Recommendation issued by Judge Netburn, recommending that Defendant’s motion to enforce the Settlement agreement be granted. Despite notification of the right to object to the Report and Recommendation, no objections were filed. Where no timely objections are made, the district court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error. Sacks v. Gandhi Eng’g, Inc., 999 F. Supp. 2d 629, 632 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). As there are no objections to the Report and Recommendation and as the Court finds no clear error in the record, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

SO ORDERED. Dated: July 19, 2022 New York, New York / ka ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. □ United States District Judge

Green v. New York City Transit Authority, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Green v. New York City Transit Authority (Green v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related