Green v. New York

Second Circuit

Green v. New York

114 F. App'x 47

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 6, 2004

DocketNo. 04-0138-PR

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 F. App'x 47 (Green v. New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. New York, 114 F. App'x 47 (2d Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

[48]*48Plaintiff-Appellant Shawn Green (“Appellant”), currently incarcerated and proceeding pro se, sued Defendants-Appellees (“Appellees”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that his federal and state constitutional rights had been violated in connection with prison disciplinary proceedings against him. The district court granted Appellees’ motion for summary judgment as to all claims, finding that no triable issues of fact had been raised as to claims against the individual defendants, and that the Eleventh Amendment barred suit against the State defendant. We find no error in the dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims for substantially the reasons stated by the court below. We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

[48]*48Plaintiff-Appellant Shawn Green (“Appellant”), currently incarcerated and proceeding pro se, sued Defendants-Appellees (“Appellees”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that his federal and state constitutional rights had been violated in connection with prison disciplinary proceedings against him. The district court granted Appellees’ motion for summary judgment as to all claims, finding that no triable issues of fact had been raised as to claims against the individual defendants, and that the Eleventh Amendment barred suit against the State defendant. We find no error in the dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims for substantially the reasons stated by the court below. We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 F. App'x 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-new-york-ca2-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack