Green v. Maroules

328 F. App'x 868
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. Maroules. Read the opinion of the Court — 211 F. App'x 159
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 27, 2009·No. 09-1051·Unpublished

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Georgia A. Green appeals from the district court’s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Green v. Maroules, No. 4:04-cv-00111-H (E.D.N.C. June 4, 2007; Sept. 2, 2008, Oct. 31, 2008, Nov. 5, 2008, Dec. 1, 2008 & Jan. 5, 2009). We deny Green’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Maroules, 328 F. App'x 868 (4th Cir. 2009).

328 F. App'x 868 (Green v. Maroules) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related