Green v. Lingo

Supreme Court of Georgia

Green v. Lingo

181 S.E. 148, 180 Ga. 853, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 581

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedAugust 7, 1935

DocketNo. 10590

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 181 S.E. 148 (Green v. Lingo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Lingo, 181 S.E. 148, 180 Ga. 853, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 581 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

1. Assignments of error not argued or insisted upon in the brief of the attorney for the plaintiff in error will be treated by the Supreme Court as abandoned. Johnson v. State, 177 Ga. 312 (3) (170 S. E. 235) ; Wilkinson v. Smith, 179 Ga. 507 (3) (176 S. E. 373).

2. A statement of facts .in the brief of the attorney for the plaintiff in error, with request to be allowed to file a brief on the law of the ease within a definite time, will not amount to argument or. insistence upon the assignments of error made in the bill of exceptions, where no such brief is subsequently filed.'

3. The abandonment of all assignments of error is equivalent to abandonment of the ease. Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI